Skip to main content

PRESUPPOSITIONAL HEDONISM

                                                   
I am a hedonist. But not just a hedonist, I am a presuppositional hedonist. Meaning that I start with the assumption that you, yes you, are a hedonist as well, whether you realize it or not. Hedonism is seeking pleasure as the highest good. If you think you don’t do that, then allow me to convince you. Pleasure is, simply put “feeling good”. The things you like make you feel good (or bring you pleasure). Now think about all the things you like, then tell me whats better. No I do not mean “rank your likes” I mean what is better (or a higher good to you) than EVERYTHING you like? I am essentially talking about “psychological egoism”. It posits that everything we do is driven by self interest, inevitably. And this to me seems to be pragmatically demonstrable, pretty basic, and accounted for in nature. Now this is natural and inevitable. But so is altruism and synergy.
A social species has evolved to interact, come together, and unify with others. Helping out in a mutually beneficial way. That's altruism, and that allows for something far greater than any individual could ever be. That’s synergy. Simply put we help each-other (altruism) because it is in our own best interest (egoism) and that creates a collective (synergy). This is why I am a collectivist. It is obvious to me that what is best for ALL individuals is more important than what is best for just ONE individual. I believe it was put best by a mob-guy in the 2007 movie “American Gangster”, he said “there always has to be order, more important than any one mans life is order”. Now you might be wondering what this has to do with pleasure. Well utilitarianism, which is all about maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain. Because I am a hedonist, I want to experience pleasure and avoid pain, but I want that for you too. I want that for everyone, and that's why I am a utilitarian as well.
I want to stress this idea is fundamentally different than “the invisible hand”. The invisible hand posits that when you work in your own best interest, you will inherently benefit everyone. Psychological egoism posits that we work to benefit others, because it is in our own best interest. This may sound similar, but the distinction is crucial, Because the invisible hand is indistinguishable from luck. It ignores the concept of selflessness, psychological egoism just says selflessness is selfish.
Now I want to encourage each and everyone of you to live like the hedonist that you are. Seek pleasure, avoid pain, and help others seek pleasure and avoid pain. This is the recipe for well-being. Live your life for pleasure, help the collective maximize it. Work against pain. Don’t ever start to think that pleasure is bad or pain is good. Pleasure is always good, all the time. Pain is always bad, all the time. Love pleasure. Hate pain. Be a utilitarian. And remember that Eric Cartman quote from Southpark, “life goes by pretty fast and if you don’t stop and look around once in awhile, and do what ever you want, all the time, you could miss it.

Comments

Post a Comment

If you have any questions or anything you can email me (conlin1213@gmail.com) tweet me (@ConTheStonerLin) or hit me up on facebook.com/conthestonerlin) linkedin.com/in/conthestonerlin) as well as reddit.com/u/conthestonerlin

Popular posts from this blog

Mutual Credit Confederation

So years ago I was talking to my dad about Milton Friedman and other “free market” “libertarian” economists, and I said that I thought it was kinda funny how a lot of these guys want government intervention in every aspect except the economy. My dad responded, saying that if anything he takes the opposite perspective, basically that all the government should do is regulate the economy. Now Years later, after reading Proudhon, understanding mutualism, and realizing the inevitability of a mixed economy, I keep coming back to this idea. Maybe this is what libertarians have gotten wrong since they became capitalists. Now I don’t fully take my dad’s perspective, as I do not see a bureaucratic state as trustworthy (in any regard). Though here I will sort of defend this perspective and explain how a government of sorts could operate in this regard and the advantage of such a system. Now I’m an anarchist, so I oppose coercion, monopolies, and centralized power. And so, as stated, a centralized...
2 comments
Read more

The Sophistry of Parents' Rights & The Importance of Children's Liberation

In this article I am going to talk about one of the most oppressed demographics of all time, A demographic who continues to be oppressed, enslaved and controlled under the guise of “taking care of” and “for their own good”. Arguments that I’m sure are familiar to any anti-racist, anti-sexist, and anti-oppression advocate for liberty. Though it seems no one is focused on the liberation of this demographic, it is ignored. Plenty of people advocate black rights, women's rights, queer rights, animal rights and even the bullshit “parents rights” but everyone forgets the children. Sure people love to scream “won’t somebody please think of the children” but no one seems interested in advocating for their rights as the autonomous agents that they are. Children are human beings and they ought be treated as such, and it’s about time someone talks about this demographic and the rights that they have been denied for too damn long.      To start, let's talk about the bullshit that is ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Problem With Power

  You have probably heard it said, “power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely”. Now you probably understand what this means, it is pretty self-explanatory. But if you are anything like me, you may have wondered why and how. Well, I have given this a lot of thought, and I think I finally understand how and why power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. First, I will define some terms, starting with power. Power is, In its broadest sense, energy over time. More energy in less time is more power. You might think that this makes sense when talking about electricity or something, but it is insufficient when talking about social power. However, I will explain how it still works. Think about the president, commonly referred to as the most powerful person in the world. Most would understand this to refer to influence rather than energy over time. But consider that high influence would imply that one could project a lot of energy in a short period of time. If you ca...
Post a Comment
Read more